<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clojure &#8211; good coding guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techbehindtech.com/2010/12/09/clojure-good-coding-guidelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techbehindtech.com/2010/12/09/clojure-good-coding-guidelines/</link>
	<description>Raw information. No finesse :)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:12:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siva Jagadeesan</title>
		<link>http://techbehindtech.com/2010/12/09/clojure-good-coding-guidelines/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siva Jagadeesan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sivajag.wordpress.com/?p=214#comment-212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ray:

It makes sense to de-structure in arg list when you want to explain to caller what kind of data the function is expecting. When you do not need to be explicit, it is better not to have de-structure in arg list as it will make it difficult to read the code.

-- Siva Jagadeesan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ray:</p>
<p>It makes sense to de-structure in arg list when you want to explain to caller what kind of data the function is expecting. When you do not need to be explicit, it is better not to have de-structure in arg list as it will make it difficult to read the code.</p>
<p>&#8211; Siva Jagadeesan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Miller</title>
		<link>http://techbehindtech.com/2010/12/09/clojure-good-coding-guidelines/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sivajag.wordpress.com/?p=214#comment-211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s the rationale for destructuring with let rather than in the arg list? Isn&#039;t the latter more succinct?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the rationale for destructuring with let rather than in the arg list? Isn&#8217;t the latter more succinct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siva Jagadeesan</title>
		<link>http://techbehindtech.com/2010/12/09/clojure-good-coding-guidelines/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siva Jagadeesan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sivajag.wordpress.com/?p=214#comment-208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are just guidelines ... if you think using &quot;when&quot; only when there is side effect works better for you, go for it..

snow flakes are going to be till jan 4th :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are just guidelines &#8230; if you think using &#8220;when&#8221; only when there is side effect works better for you, go for it..</p>
<p>snow flakes are going to be till jan 4th <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsteuber</title>
		<link>http://techbehindtech.com/2010/12/09/clojure-good-coding-guidelines/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bsteuber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sivajag.wordpress.com/?p=214#comment-207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I meant to write &quot;side effects&quot; :)
I thought I remember it from Common Lisp, but everything I googled now agrees with you so either I remember it wrong or it was just one or two authors. So I will now use when even without side effects...

P.S. Man, your blog just made me think my monitor&#039;s damaged =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant to write &#8220;side effects&#8221; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I thought I remember it from Common Lisp, but everything I googled now agrees with you so either I remember it wrong or it was just one or two authors. So I will now use when even without side effects&#8230;</p>
<p>P.S. Man, your blog just made me think my monitor&#8217;s damaged =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siva Jagadeesan</title>
		<link>http://techbehindtech.com/2010/12/09/clojure-good-coding-guidelines/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siva Jagadeesan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sivajag.wordpress.com/?p=214#comment-206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason for if-rule is it makes it easy to read the code. By looking at code, we could easily differentiate when there is &quot;else&quot; clause and when there is no &quot;else&quot; clause. Could you explain what do you mean by &quot;wide effects&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for if-rule is it makes it easy to read the code. By looking at code, we could easily differentiate when there is &#8220;else&#8221; clause and when there is no &#8220;else&#8221; clause. Could you explain what do you mean by &#8220;wide effects&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsteuber</title>
		<link>http://techbehindtech.com/2010/12/09/clojure-good-coding-guidelines/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bsteuber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sivajag.wordpress.com/?p=214#comment-205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice, one remark though:
A rule I know is &quot;use when if you&#039;re doing wide effects only&quot; which contradicts your if-rule. So which one is better?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, one remark though:<br />
A rule I know is &#8220;use when if you&#8217;re doing wide effects only&#8221; which contradicts your if-rule. So which one is better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
